Wednesday, April 10, 2013

Will President Obama sell Out US Seniors and our children for a Deal with the Republicans?

Salivating Over Social Security Cuts

Dear Global Action on Aging Friends,

Wherever you live, please note the very real possibility that President Obama will seriously weaken or even destroy the Social Security Program for a "deal" with Republicans over the US Budget.  Not only will such action undercut the modest living standard of US elders but it also threatens young workers who have contributed to the program since they entered the workforce. 

Mind you, US citizens have already seen the Federal Government "borrow" from Social Security to support other programs--and failed to re-pay the debt.  Read excerpts from Robert Reich's Blog (April 10, 2013) for the full story:

ohn Boehner, Speaker of the House, revealed why it's politically naive for the President to offer up cuts in Social Security in the hope of getting Republicans to close some tax loopholes for the rich. "If the President believes these modest entitlement savings are needed to help shore up these programs, there's no reason they should be held hostage for more tax hikes,” Boehner said in a statement released Friday.
House Majority Leader Eric Cantor agreed. He said on CNBC he didn't understand "why we just don't see the White House come forward and do the things that we agree on” such as cutting Social Security, without additional tax increases.
Get it? The Republican leadership is already salivating over the President's proposed Social Security cut. They've been wanting to cut Social Security for years.
But they won't agree to close tax loopholes for the rich.
They're already characterizing the President's plan as a way to "save” Social Security - even though the cuts would undermine it - and they're embracing it as an act of "bi-partisanship.”
"I'm encouraged by any steps that President Obama is taking to save and preserve Social Security,” cooed Texas Republican firebrand Ted Cruz. "I think it should be a bipartisan priority to strengthen Social Security and Medicare to preserve the benefits for existing seniors.”
Oh, please.
And the day Ted Cruz agrees to raise taxes on the wealthy or even close a tax loophole will be when Texas freezes over.
The President is scheduled to dine with a dozen Senate Republicans Wednesday night. Among those attending will be John Boozman of Arkansas, who has already praised Obama for "starting to throw things on the table,” like the Social Security cuts.
That's exactly the problem. The President throws things on the table before the Republicans have even sat down for dinner.
The President's predilection for negotiating with himself is not new. But his willingness to do it with Social Security, the government's most popular program - which Democrats have protected from Republican assaults for almost eighty years - doesn't bode well.
The President desperately wants a "grand bargain” on the deficit. Republicans know he does. Watch your wallets.

GAA Readers:  Write the President and your Congressional Representatives to protest!  Organize a Demonstration (with your family and friends in your Community) demanding a stop to this disastrous plan to ruin US Social Security! Take action to alert citizens, young and old! 

Susanne Paul for Global Action on Aging

Monday, April 8, 2013

Getting Older? Start Exercising!

Reuters News reports that America's ageing population is posing special challenges. Why?  Fitness experts say it is difficult to design effective workout routines for people with such a wide range of abilities. For one 70-year-old, the goal may be to run a marathon; for another it's getting out of a chair.  And more people join the "older" ranks every day.  The US older population grew from 3 million in 1900 to 40 million in 2010.

Experts say that older adults should be doing aerobic activity to help maintain body weight, strengthening exercises to develop and maintain muscle mass and some type of flexibility training.  Physical activity can reduce the risk of diseases such as diabetes, hypertension and osteoporosis and improve the quality of life by maintaining functional capacity, such as the ability to climb stairs, open doors, and carry groceries.

Mary Ann Wilson is the creator and host of the program, "Sit and Be Fit," that includes warm-up, circulation and strength segments, a finger segment (for stiffness), standing for balance, and relaxation.  Posture, breathing, balance, cognitive functioning and reaction time are among the most important—and neglected—components of elder fitness, she said.

Karen Peterson, author of "Move with Balance: Healthy Aging Activities for Brain and Body," stresses a mind-body approach in workouts with seniors.  Her exercises include tossing a bean bag to improve reaction time, walking a figure-eight pattern for balance, as well as eye stretches, jaw relaxers and cognitive challenges to keep body and mind alert.  "We take balance exercises and add conversation or math problems," she said. "The concept is to always progress, always get more challenging." 

Experts agree that it's never too late to do something to improve our physical well-being. "Exercise is effective even in the most frail individual," Wilson said. "If they can wiggle their toes, they can exercise."

See you at Gym!  Susanne Paul for Global Action on Aging

Friday, April 5, 2013

US Citizens: Resist and Oppose President Obama's efforts to cut Social Security and other Old Age Programs!

(CNN) -- President Barack Obama intends to cut Social Security and Medicare in his proposed changes included in his proposed budget plan.  He also plans to add new tax increases (on the richest US citizens?), in an effort to reach a deal with Republicans on deficit reduction.  Please do what you can--phone, write, call, demonstrate--against these changes that could potentially reduce even further the quality of life for US seniors across the country.

The progressive group, MoveOn.org, has labeled the President's proposed changes to Social Security as "unconscionable" and Democracy for America called the cuts "profoundly disturbing."
"Millions of MoveOn members did not work night and day to put President Obama into office so that he could propose policies that would hurt some of our most vulnerable people," read a statement from Anna Galland, executive director of the group.   Well, it looks like the President fooled them! 

The "new" Obama plan will likely mimic the proposal that he made last year that included $400 billion in savings from Medicare over 10 years.  US seniors and our families must stand strong to resist this drastic change in our life chances in old age.  And younger citizens must look at this precedent:  the US Government has borrowed from Social Security . . . .but has it paid off its existing debt to citizens and the Social Security Program?  Ask your Congressperson.   Get the facts!

If you have comments, please send. 

With thanks for your advocacy by, with, and for older people (and those who will one day be "old") in the USA.
Susanne Paul for Global Action on Aging




Wednesday, April 3, 2013

How can we have a "Good Death?"

Dear GAA Friend,

A good friend of Global Action on Aging, Paul Kleyman, a key reporter for New America Media, has written a very fine article describing how medical personnel are learning from their patients about their needs, concerns and desires as they approach death.  Kleyman explores how doctors are learning from their patients about what they want to do, to engage in and to carry out in the closing days of their lives.  I think that you and your loved ones will find this article helpful as each of us considers what our last days and hours might be like.  
 
Have a good week, Susanne Paul for Global Action on Aging

 

Patients Teach Doctor How to Heal at the End of Life

Patients Teach Doctor How to Heal at the End of Life

 

New America Media, News Report, Paul Kleyman, Posted: Apr 03, 2013

Photo: Dr. V.J. Periyakoil is shown with one of her patients, Daniel Shaine. (Courtesy of the VA Palo Alto Health Care System)

PALO ALTO, Calif. -- How does a doctor specializing in saving lives turn into one of the nation's leading experts -- and medical educators -- on end-of-life care?

Dr. Vyjeyanthi "V.J." Periyakoil says her 25-year journey from medical school in her native India to directing Stanford University's palliative-care fellowship program taught her that the art of healing lies in listening to her patients. What she heard wasn't always in the medical textbooks.

What they told her led Periyakoil to becoming a leading voice in the movement to reconceptualize end-of-life care from limited hospice treatment in the last six months of life to comprehensive treatment for profoundly ill people .

"Much of my work had been on the importance of dignity in health care," Periyakoil recalls.

What People Want at Life’s EndStanford University palliative care expert, Dr. Vyjeyanthi “V.J.” Periyakoil believes that contrary to conventional wisdom, most patients don’t simply want every medical intervention that may or may not prolong their lives.
Overall people want appropriate care sensitive to their quality of life and, enabling them to experience their final days as fully as possible with minimal stress for their families.
In fact, a 2012 report by the California Health Care Foundation affirmed Periyakoil’s understanding of what patients hope for. First and foremost, Californians in the study said they didn’t want their families burdened by the cost of their care, or by having to struggle with troubling decisions about their treatment.

Also, participants in the poll said they wanted to be comfortable without pain and hoped to be “at peace spiritually.” On the survey’s list of 12 “Most Important Factors at End of Life,” people placed the desire “to live as long as possible” down at number 10.

The survey does show difference among ethnic groups. Although more than half of Latinos (56 percent) rated prolonging life as their top choice, only 18 percent of Asians did so, followed by 25 percent of whites and 43 percent of African Americans.

Palliative care is such a growing national concern that the federal Institute of Medicine launched its new Committee on Transforming End-of-Life Care in February.

--Paul Kleyman
She found that patients "cared more about concrete things -- 'Treat my pain first, take care of me first -- then you can treat me with respect.' For patients, that meant good pain care and symptom management, which is good palliative care."

Periyakoil began her practice in the United States as a resident in the crowded wards of Stockton's San Joaquin General Hospital. Her patients were mainly "migrant farmworkers, people with no insurance, people who didn't want to give you too much information" because of their immigration status or their fear they couldn't afford the treatment being prescribed.

She felt especially awkward when the medical advice she offered proved irrelevant to her patients' lives. "There was a mother of young children who had two jobs. I would tell her, 'Why don't you put your feet up? Why don't you eat more protein?' She'd try to answer, 'Well, I have to get back to work,' and I'd just continue to give the same silly advice."

Sensing her frustration, it was the patients who tried to reassure her. "'Oh, yes, I'll do that, doctor...Don't worry about me,' they'd say."

Struck by how many of her Stockton patients were immigrants, like herself, Periyakoil worked hard to make herself understood while also sensitizing herself to cross-cultural issues.

"When I first came to the U.S., I could read and write English very well, but because of my accent, my patients couldn't understand what I was saying," she recalls. She focused on enunciating every English word clearly, and came to appreciate nonverbal forms of expression -- like a worried look that exposed a patient's unspoken concern. The better she was able to communicate, the more likely her patients were to follow her medical recommendations.

Later at Stanford Medical School, where Periyakoil studied geriatric medicine, shediscovered another gap in her knowledge from patients who were deemed to have only six months or less left to live. Admitted to hospice care, their cure-oriented medical treatment would often be stopped in favor of "comfort" care.

"I had a hard time giving up on these patients," she admits.

Her determination to improve the quality of their lives, no matter how much time they had left, led her to realize that palliative treatment should begin as soon as a patient is diagnosed with a life-threatening disease. Care provided only when someone becomes eligible for terminal hospice coverage comes too late to fully help them.

So, for example, the average hospice stay in the United States is now only 19 days. But palliative medicine begun much earlier reduces the agony and stress of disease so well that many patients actually survive longer. And family caregivers, relieved of constant stress, have been shown to live longer following a loved one's death.

"Palliative care should be woven seamlessly into treatment," noted Periyakoil, who is also associate director of Palliative Care Services at the VA Palo Alto Health Care System. "Patients shouldn't have to know the word 'palliative care.' It should be something that is given to you when and where you need it because it is the standard practice."

Periyakoil also discovered that patients who come from cultures that discourage, even prohibit, open acknowledgement of death and dying typically wind up having their referrals to hospice treatment delayed until it's too late for them to benefit from broader palliative care.

At Cultural Boundaries of Death


She learned that cultural boundaries around death could be violated in other ways. She recalls a home visit she made to see a young Chinese woman with late-stage cancer. "The husband opened the door silently, did not respond to my greeting and went into his wife's bedroom. She must have died moments earlier. When I squatted down next to her body to check her pulse and prepare an official death pronouncement, her husband gently shook his head."

Sensing she was intruding in a sacred moment, Periyakoil withdrew. At the door she wanted to offer her condolences but the husband once again shook his head and her words froze in her mouth.

"Later I learned that Chinese Buddhists believe the soul lingers in the body for some time after death. So they do not touch the body nor vocally express grief as this might disrupt the passage of the dying person's soul and prevent them from being reborn into a better life."

To help doctors become culturally fluent, Periyakoil is producing a free, online text series addressing the sensitivities of 13 distinct ethnic groups, among them African Americans, American Indians, South Asians and East Asians.

Also she is developing videos for an online series on the need for doctors and the public to share decision making, titled "Can We Talk: Conversations with multi-cultural Americans about end-of-life care." In the segments, professional actors depict scenes from common patient situations drawn from doctors' real-life experiences.

At Stanford's Palliative Care Education and Training Program, Periyakoil's fellows embrace her holistic approach. "Palliative care is one of the few fields of medicine where you deal with the whole person," says Thui Pham, an internist. "There are so many factors that impact life, not just the medical issues."

"Palliative care is not about the end of life," Periyakoil concurs. "It's about how a patient can get the most out of every day."