Showing posts with label nursing home elder rights health. Show all posts
Showing posts with label nursing home elder rights health. Show all posts

Tuesday, August 6, 2013

The Color of Care in Aging America/New American Media

The Color of Care in Aging America

The Color of Care in Aging America

This article is adapted from a story Matt Perry wrote as part of the MetLife Foundation Journalists in Aging Fellows program, a collaboration of New America Media and the Gerontological Society of America.  California Health Report/New America Media, News Feature, Matt Perry, Posted: Aug 05, 2013


Part 2. Read Part 1 here.

LOS ANGELES--During his first presidential campaign, Democratic hopeful Barack Obama famously claimed that Americans discussed racial conflicts honestly – behind closed doors. Some experts in aging say it’s now time to break open those same doors and look at America’s caregiving crisis — and its growing issues of race – just as honestly.

The country’s heralded melting pot is quickly becoming a complex racial stew at both ends of the nation’s caregiving spectrum: for those needing care--and for the family members and hired workers providing it.

Undocumented Caregivers in “Grey Market”

As of 2011, 20 percent of the country’s 4 million hired caregivers were foreign-born, according to the Paraprofessional Healthcare Institute (PHI), which represents direct caregivers – hired nurses, home health aides and personal attendants.

Yet that number doesn’t include the “grey market” of workers employed directly by families that include immigrants – among them undocumented workers. Some even suggest the actual number of immigrant caregivers is closer to 50 percent.

While race, culture and religion shouldn’t affect the care provided to older adults, the reality is simple: It does.

John Booker has seen it throughout his 35 years as a caregiver.

He recalls meeting an Orange County, Calif., woman whose son moved her from facility to facility hoping to find quality care. Finally, she was placed in the hands of Booker – who is African American.
“She needed help getting to the toilet, and she didn’t want a damn n----r to do it,” laughed Booker.

“After she attacked me, I knew my reaction was extremely critical at that point. I put my best professional face on.”

Afterwards, the tearful woman thanked Booker for his help, as did a young man standing outside the room who watched the interaction – her son was also an owner of the long-term care facility.

Overt racism, while rare, is indicative of the continued struggles Americans face when it comes to race – particularly in an intimate relationship like caregiving.

During his own long career, Booker noted, who founded the National Association for Direct Care Workers of Color, “I would say 40 percent of the time there was some initial friction [over race].”
Booker said his typically female colleagues – Latinos, Filipinos, Caribbean Islanders and recent African Immigrants – are acutely aware of race in the workplace.

“They will get some of the same racial slurs and looks,” he said. “You hold back your emotions and continue to give quality care.”

Cultural, Religious Impacts

A Stanford University researcher says that race and ethnicity are often linked to cultural and religious views – which may affect care. In fact, her study of multicultural nurses in long-term care settings found something shocking: During end-of-life care, some foreign-born Catholic nurses felt the dying experience shouldn’t be altered by using painkilling analgesics.

“They felt that experiencing pain and suffering at the [end of life] afforded the dying patient an important opportunity for spiritual redemption,” reads the small study of 45 Filipina nurses, led by V.J. Periyakoil, MD, director of palliative care education and training at Stanford’s School of Medicine. “None of the U.S.-born nurses endorsed this concept.”

Periyakoil – who admitted “we were pretty surprised” at the results – described the concept of “redemptive suffering” in this way: “Sometimes people feel that God is giving them these experiences, and part of their faith is to bear these experiences with as much patience as they can. How the religious beliefs of an individual nurse – or doctor – affects how they provide care is a bit of an unknown.”

She continued, “If I’m the nurse who believes in the concept of redemptive suffering. . . . I may not offer that [painkiller] to the patient, even if I see them in pain.” In fact, she said, some patients welcome this sense of redemptive pain, but nurses need to give a patient the choice.

In another example of the enormous influence of cultural and religious views on care, Periyakoil described the family of a Chinese American patient with esophageal cancer. He feared that if he died on an empty stomach “he would wander throughout eternity as a hungry ghost,” she said. He was given a feeding tube.

Periyakoil adds that cultural differences strongly influence caregiving behaviors.

Caregivers who acknowledge “familismo” and “respecto” within more collective, group-oriented Latino families will gain their trust. Conversely, Periyakoil said, more individualized cultures like Germans thrive on care that fosters patient autonomy and more direct, factual communication.

Compassionate Care Despite Language Limits

To many, cultural differences can actually prove beneficial.

Carla Troutner said her tiny 4-foot-11-inch mother had two homecare aides in the San Francisco Bay Area – one white, the other Haitian. While the white caregiver provided acceptable care, the Caribbean caregiver offered a uniquely calm disposition her mother adored.

“She just followed her around the house,” Troutner said of her mother.

Sadhna Diwan recalled a long-term care facility staffed almost entirely with Latino caregivers – some who spoke virtually no English.

“This became a real bone of contention between the families and the hired caregivers,” said Diwan, director of the Center for Healthy Aging in Multicultural Populations at San Jose University’s School of Social Work.

Yet the Latino workers’ compassionate care happily countered the language barrier. “The love and affection and care they show for my parents – even I don’t do that,” stated Diwan.

Some advocates in aging, though, claim ethnic differences in caregiving are being overstated – and education is leveling the playing field.

MariaElena Del Valle cautioned that ethnic differences in healthcare are slowly being filtered out. Training for today’s hired caregivers increasingly focuses on removing these cultural differences, she said. The goal: Don’t impose your belief systems – personal, cultural or spiritual – on the patient; ask patients about their preferences.

“When you’re meeting for the first time we ask you to be curious,” said Del Valle, an organizational-change consultant with PHI. “Active listening means that you focus on the perspective of the speaker, and that requires the listener to let go of cultural biases that come up.”

Del Valle has already seen the effect of culturally sensitive training for hired caregivers – both at home and at long-term care facilities.

“They’re already seeing results, and the home health aides are asking for more training,” she added.
PHI claims the United States will need another 1 million paid caregivers by 2020, and says personal care and home health aides are growing faster than any other profession. In fact, by the end of this decade the group predicts caregivers will be the largest occupational force in the country – topping both K-12 teachers and law enforcement personnel.

Since caregiving often requires no formal education – especially in the underground economy – these jobs are expected to go increasingly to immigrants – from Latin America, the Philippines, the Caribbean and elsewhere.

Cultural Competence

Diwan said the programs at San Jose State University focus on “cultural competence” in diverse populations – respecting the unique culture and needs of patients.

For families taking care of older adults themselves, cultural attitudes run deep. Diwan observed that many immigrants from traditional cultures see caring for their aging parents and grandparents as an important responsibility.

Yet this admirable reverence can have also have negative consequences, she said. “Often times [family] caregivers will burn themselves out because they feel like they have to do everything.”
In addition, ethnic adults are also aging, with Latinos on the fastest-rising curve. Stanford’s Periyakoil said America’s aging “silver tsunami” – over 8,000 citizens turn 65 each day – now has a new name. “People are actually talking about the silver-brown tsunami,” she commented.

With an aging ethnic population and more immigrant caregivers, Americans should prepare for a colorful future: Filipinos providing care for older Latinos, African-Americans helping aging Russians, and Asian caregivers assisting Afghani elders.

Del Valle said all of these complex issues of race need to be explored in the open. “I consider the very act of asking this question to raise awareness,” she said.

John Booker of the National Association for Direct Care Workers of Color agreed, “I would hope that it would disappear with the younger generations.
As a reader of Global Action on Aging's blog, will you comment by writing to www.globalaging.blogpost.com     Thanks, Susanne Paul at Global Action on Aging
 
 

Wednesday, April 3, 2013

How can we have a "Good Death?"

Dear GAA Friend,

A good friend of Global Action on Aging, Paul Kleyman, a key reporter for New America Media, has written a very fine article describing how medical personnel are learning from their patients about their needs, concerns and desires as they approach death.  Kleyman explores how doctors are learning from their patients about what they want to do, to engage in and to carry out in the closing days of their lives.  I think that you and your loved ones will find this article helpful as each of us considers what our last days and hours might be like.  
 
Have a good week, Susanne Paul for Global Action on Aging

 

Patients Teach Doctor How to Heal at the End of Life

Patients Teach Doctor How to Heal at the End of Life

 

New America Media, News Report, Paul Kleyman, Posted: Apr 03, 2013

Photo: Dr. V.J. Periyakoil is shown with one of her patients, Daniel Shaine. (Courtesy of the VA Palo Alto Health Care System)

PALO ALTO, Calif. -- How does a doctor specializing in saving lives turn into one of the nation's leading experts -- and medical educators -- on end-of-life care?

Dr. Vyjeyanthi "V.J." Periyakoil says her 25-year journey from medical school in her native India to directing Stanford University's palliative-care fellowship program taught her that the art of healing lies in listening to her patients. What she heard wasn't always in the medical textbooks.

What they told her led Periyakoil to becoming a leading voice in the movement to reconceptualize end-of-life care from limited hospice treatment in the last six months of life to comprehensive treatment for profoundly ill people .

"Much of my work had been on the importance of dignity in health care," Periyakoil recalls.

What People Want at Life’s EndStanford University palliative care expert, Dr. Vyjeyanthi “V.J.” Periyakoil believes that contrary to conventional wisdom, most patients don’t simply want every medical intervention that may or may not prolong their lives.
Overall people want appropriate care sensitive to their quality of life and, enabling them to experience their final days as fully as possible with minimal stress for their families.
In fact, a 2012 report by the California Health Care Foundation affirmed Periyakoil’s understanding of what patients hope for. First and foremost, Californians in the study said they didn’t want their families burdened by the cost of their care, or by having to struggle with troubling decisions about their treatment.

Also, participants in the poll said they wanted to be comfortable without pain and hoped to be “at peace spiritually.” On the survey’s list of 12 “Most Important Factors at End of Life,” people placed the desire “to live as long as possible” down at number 10.

The survey does show difference among ethnic groups. Although more than half of Latinos (56 percent) rated prolonging life as their top choice, only 18 percent of Asians did so, followed by 25 percent of whites and 43 percent of African Americans.

Palliative care is such a growing national concern that the federal Institute of Medicine launched its new Committee on Transforming End-of-Life Care in February.

--Paul Kleyman
She found that patients "cared more about concrete things -- 'Treat my pain first, take care of me first -- then you can treat me with respect.' For patients, that meant good pain care and symptom management, which is good palliative care."

Periyakoil began her practice in the United States as a resident in the crowded wards of Stockton's San Joaquin General Hospital. Her patients were mainly "migrant farmworkers, people with no insurance, people who didn't want to give you too much information" because of their immigration status or their fear they couldn't afford the treatment being prescribed.

She felt especially awkward when the medical advice she offered proved irrelevant to her patients' lives. "There was a mother of young children who had two jobs. I would tell her, 'Why don't you put your feet up? Why don't you eat more protein?' She'd try to answer, 'Well, I have to get back to work,' and I'd just continue to give the same silly advice."

Sensing her frustration, it was the patients who tried to reassure her. "'Oh, yes, I'll do that, doctor...Don't worry about me,' they'd say."

Struck by how many of her Stockton patients were immigrants, like herself, Periyakoil worked hard to make herself understood while also sensitizing herself to cross-cultural issues.

"When I first came to the U.S., I could read and write English very well, but because of my accent, my patients couldn't understand what I was saying," she recalls. She focused on enunciating every English word clearly, and came to appreciate nonverbal forms of expression -- like a worried look that exposed a patient's unspoken concern. The better she was able to communicate, the more likely her patients were to follow her medical recommendations.

Later at Stanford Medical School, where Periyakoil studied geriatric medicine, shediscovered another gap in her knowledge from patients who were deemed to have only six months or less left to live. Admitted to hospice care, their cure-oriented medical treatment would often be stopped in favor of "comfort" care.

"I had a hard time giving up on these patients," she admits.

Her determination to improve the quality of their lives, no matter how much time they had left, led her to realize that palliative treatment should begin as soon as a patient is diagnosed with a life-threatening disease. Care provided only when someone becomes eligible for terminal hospice coverage comes too late to fully help them.

So, for example, the average hospice stay in the United States is now only 19 days. But palliative medicine begun much earlier reduces the agony and stress of disease so well that many patients actually survive longer. And family caregivers, relieved of constant stress, have been shown to live longer following a loved one's death.

"Palliative care should be woven seamlessly into treatment," noted Periyakoil, who is also associate director of Palliative Care Services at the VA Palo Alto Health Care System. "Patients shouldn't have to know the word 'palliative care.' It should be something that is given to you when and where you need it because it is the standard practice."

Periyakoil also discovered that patients who come from cultures that discourage, even prohibit, open acknowledgement of death and dying typically wind up having their referrals to hospice treatment delayed until it's too late for them to benefit from broader palliative care.

At Cultural Boundaries of Death


She learned that cultural boundaries around death could be violated in other ways. She recalls a home visit she made to see a young Chinese woman with late-stage cancer. "The husband opened the door silently, did not respond to my greeting and went into his wife's bedroom. She must have died moments earlier. When I squatted down next to her body to check her pulse and prepare an official death pronouncement, her husband gently shook his head."

Sensing she was intruding in a sacred moment, Periyakoil withdrew. At the door she wanted to offer her condolences but the husband once again shook his head and her words froze in her mouth.

"Later I learned that Chinese Buddhists believe the soul lingers in the body for some time after death. So they do not touch the body nor vocally express grief as this might disrupt the passage of the dying person's soul and prevent them from being reborn into a better life."

To help doctors become culturally fluent, Periyakoil is producing a free, online text series addressing the sensitivities of 13 distinct ethnic groups, among them African Americans, American Indians, South Asians and East Asians.

Also she is developing videos for an online series on the need for doctors and the public to share decision making, titled "Can We Talk: Conversations with multi-cultural Americans about end-of-life care." In the segments, professional actors depict scenes from common patient situations drawn from doctors' real-life experiences.

At Stanford's Palliative Care Education and Training Program, Periyakoil's fellows embrace her holistic approach. "Palliative care is one of the few fields of medicine where you deal with the whole person," says Thui Pham, an internist. "There are so many factors that impact life, not just the medical issues."

"Palliative care is not about the end of life," Periyakoil concurs. "It's about how a patient can get the most out of every day."

Thursday, March 14, 2013

US Retirement Age getting Older and Older

Steven Greenhouse, a New York Times reporter, published a very provocative article on March12, 2013, detailing how US citizens are delaying retirement until older and older ages.

Why?  Greenhouse says that some "older persons" still feel young and want to work or devote themselves to a new project or compelling interest. Others stay on the job, worried that they may have serious medical bills in the future, and seek additonal resources in the event that Social Security and Medicare prove insufficient.

Another group thinks that their savings are inadequate or anticipate having to support their parents in their old age, thus reducing resources for adult children.  Costs of higher education for children has increased  drastically over the past decades and pulled down their savings. Some potential retirees have helped their own parents to live in a nursing home and thereby reduced their personal savings for retirement.  Still others have footed the bill to send children to college, depleting their "retirement savings."     
  
What is happening now?  Many more older US citizens are living into their late 80s and 90s and outliving their retirement savings.  What does this mean?     
      
Greenhouse cites a Boston College study that found that "53 percent of Americans were 'at risk' of being unable to maintain their pre-retirement standard of living once they retire, up from 30 percent in 1989. A study last May by the Employee Benefit Research Institute found that 44 percent may not have enough money to meet their basic needs in retirement."
        
Today, one-third of retirees in the United States rely solely on Social Security, with benefits averaging just over $15,000 a year for an individual and $30,000 for a couple.  Can you live on this income? It can't be easy.
      
A generation ago, most workers with employer-based retirement plans were enrolled in traditional pension plans promising a monthly stipend for life after retirement.  But that's changed drastically.  The BLS (Bureau of Labor Statistics) data shows that only a quarter of all workers now enjoy a "traditional pension plan."  Only 26 percent of all workers are in such pension plans, including 17 percent of private-sector workers, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Most people whose employers do offer retirement plans are enrolled in 401(k)’s instead, and 58 percent of workers are not participating in an employer-based retirement plan, according to the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College.
 
What's the future of those who will "come of old age" in the years and decades ahead?  Will we/they live in poverty and misery with fore-shortened lives?  Will the US economic system support or sustain its elder citizens?  Or will the 1% who control so much US wealth today ignore their fellow citizens?  What do you think?  Please share your views in our comments section.
 
Susanne Paul for Global Action on Aging 
 
 

Wednesday, February 6, 2013

Dr. Oliver Fein's Interview on Medicare Costs

Becker's Hospital Review published Bob Herman's interview with Dr. Oliver Fein of Weill Cornell Medical College on February 6, 2013.  Read this article to understand how financial interests--operating at many levels--are raising the cost of health care in the US.   When you finish, send your comments, please.

"For Oliver Fein, MD, Medicare and other public healthcare policies have been a major part of his life since he left Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine in 1967. Currently, Dr. Fein is a general internist at NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital in New York City, a professor of clinical medicine and public health at Weill Cornell Medical College and chair of the New York Metro Chapter of Physicians for a National Health Program.

Dr. Fein says he has always been interested in the delivery of healthcare to vulnerable populations, especially the poor and elderly. He spent his residency in public hospitals, and his clinical practice was based in academic medical centers where he could continue to see Medicaid and Medicare patients. When it comes to Medicare, Dr. Fein explains it is "not a perfect program," but it will continue to be tremendously important for hospitals and physicians alike.

Here, he shares his thoughts on where Medicare stands today, if the program is really as insolvent, as some say it is, and what he would do if he helmed CMS.

Question: Medicare is, for all intents and purposes, one of the most important payors in the country. What are some of the fundamental problems with it, and what does it do well? Is it really as insolvent as some public policy leaders say it is?

Dr. Oliver Fein is a professor at Weill Cornell Medical College.Dr. Oliver Fein:
Let's start with what Medicare does well. [Medicare] is a situation where when you turn 65 and have worked 40 quarters, or 10 years, in this country, you're eligible. The simple eligibility of Medicare is just wonderful, and I think people really appreciate that.

From a physician's point of view, the sense I have is, there are some that believe Medicare doesn't pay them enough. So, therefore, they don't take Medicare patients. I think that's been highly exaggerated. There was a study from the Archives of Internal Medicine in 2011 that argues, in fact, the number of physicians that accept Medicare is much larger than acknowledged in the anecdotal literature. That may change if this whole [sustainable growth rate] issue isn't solved.

The other thing to say is many [physicians] who are in private practice have told me they like Medicare because they can count on getting the check each month. There's no hassle of claims being denied that occurs with private health insurance. What has happened is most insurers are for-profit entities. Any way they can delay payment means they can make money on premiums they've collected. Well, since there is no for-profit motive in Medicare, claims denials are rare. I think overall, beneficiaries like Medicare, and it's a program that physicians overwhelmingly think is an important program for them.

For hospitals, Medicare is kind of their intermediate payor. It may not be as good as contracts they've been able to negotiate with private insurers, but it's better than contracts with Medicaid insurers. The result is even specialized places like Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center take Medicare whereas they may deny certain for-profit private insurers because they feel they don't get adequate reimbursement from them.

In terms of Medicare's solvency, Medicare's trustees and most economists will say the money that has been collected from people's payroll checks makes the program solvent through 2024. So what does that mean? The money is there to pay projected payouts that will be needed in those years for Part A. Some people are talking about Medicare going broke after that. It is perhaps that the monies collected won't equal what's paid out — but that assumes there's no change in the payroll tax. Currently, [payroll tax contributions to Medicare] are 1.45 percent from you and 1.45 percent from your employer. Let's increase that by a little bit to 1.5 or 1.55 percent of salary, and we could extend the life of this program on the Part A side to perhaps 2040 or 2050. I think that's one dimension.

The other thing to realize is that on the Part B side, Medicare is a 25-75 program. The beneficiary, on average, contributes 25 percent of cost of the program, and the government takes the rest out of current tax revenues. Does that mean program is broke? Well, if we continue to have wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and have military costs that are so substantial, we're not going to collect enough tax revenue to cover it. [However], if you just shrink [the military budget] a little bit, we'll have plenty of money to cover Part B contributions.

Part C, or Medicare Advantage, is also designed in such a way where beneficiaries are able to elect a private health insurance company to mange their benefits. And when that happens, the doctor and the hospital are dealing with a private insurance company, not Medicare. What has been shown is private [Medicare Advantage] companies are getting 11 to 14 percent more money than if the beneficiary stayed in the public program. The program is designed to reimburse the private insurance companies more generously. They also risk select, and one of the classic ways they do that is by offering a free gym club membership, for example. So if we really paid private insurers less [Medicare] money, there would be more money in program, and again one wouldn't be talking about us going broke.

Q: There's been a consistent refrain in the hospital sector that raising the eligibility age of Medicare from 65 to 67 or higher would help control costs as well. What do you think would result from that plan?

OF:
It will deal with the government costs. If you don't cover a whole sector of the population, sure, Part A costs will be less, Part B costs will be less, Part C and D costs will be less. But it is enormously unfair, and the hospital sector will ultimately get very hurt by this. This works for people of upper incomes because many of them actually do work past age 67. It's the laboring class — the coal miners, steelworkers, garbage collectors, people who have to do real, physical labor who frankly ought to retire at age 65 who are the ones really adversely affected by this.

If those older, low-income folks are laid off by their employers, they lose their insurance — and that will come back to slap hospitals in the face. When contrasted with 30-year-olds with no insurance, hospitals will find themselves swimming in a new form of debt.

Q: What about the inverse? What if Medicare's age was lowered to add in younger, healthier people?

OF:
That's where we should be going, it seems to me. Incorporate younger people in Medicare, who will cost the program much less on a per capita basis. One could decide to cover children. Children are a great example. They require relatively cheap care even though they do have immunizations in the first year of life. But on a per capita basis, they are much cheaper. Let's incorporate them in the Medicare program, and as they get older, keep them in the program.

Q: What about reducing the number of health insurers? Would that make financial planning at hospitals, for example, easier?

OF:
The studies we've looked at show that since administrative costs of multiple health insurers are on average 20 percent to the insurance company and up to 40 percent to the physician because they have to hire extra staff to deal with multiple insurers and challenge unjustly denied claims. [Physicians for a National Health Program] decided to compare Toronto General in single-payor Canada with Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, since they are similarly sized. At Toronto General, there were three billers in the billing office; Massachusetts General had over 300.

Frankly, every single-payor bill that exists in Congress includes jobs retraining, so if we went to single-payor, there wouldn't be this concern. We haven't actually seen a good economic study of how many fewer employees you would need in the insurance sector. Some people have looked at the issue in terms of the amount of time a primary care physician has to spend dealing with prior approval, denial of claims, so on and so forth. Larry Casalino, MD, PhD, [chief of the division of outcomes and effectiveness research at Weill Cornell Medical College] shows that in terms of income, practicing primary care physicians are probably spending an enormous amount of money having to deal with multiple insurers.

Q: If you were in charge of CMS, what would be some of your main initiatives?

OF:
Initially, I would try to figure out a good strategy to reduce payments to the private health insurers who take Part C and see if we couldn't get that down to a more reasonable amount of money. CMS doesn't control the percentage of payroll tax, and CMS doesn't control how to get more money into the system. All that it could control is how to spend less and do it efficiently.

Medicare's deductable for Part A has become quite substantial. It's now over $1,100. Part B's deductible is $140. Part D's is $335. These are major barriers to low-income patients' access to care. I would like to see them reduced or eliminated. I also would like get rid of the doughnut hole, and the proposal in the ACA will eliminate it later in 2020.

I would propose a lot of things Don Berwick, MD, [former CMS administrator] was doing to boost quality and reduce cost, but they would not be adequate. For instance, penalties for readmissions — yeah sure. But hospitals are paid on a DRG basis, and physicians are paid on a fee-for-service basis. The physician has an incentive to keep patient in hospital longer, and the hospital has an incentive to get the patient out.

To the degree the physician has patients' interest in mind, it may be good for physicians to resist the hospitals' pressures to discharge early. I'm not sure I want to give physicians a financial incentive to do that, but it may make sense that the physician who is close to the patient feels this patient really can't go home, is not medically stable, the home situation isn't ideal to go to yet — I respect that. That's important."

Monday, December 31, 2012

DO YOU HAVE HIV/AIDS in your SENIOR YEARS?

Dear Global Action on Aging Readers,  As the New Year arrives, resolve to have Safe Sex!  If you live in the US, here are some useful resources.  If you live elsewhere, check your government's HIV/AIDS prevention programs.  Cheers and have a very Happy New Year from all of us at Global Action on Aging.

Treatment and Prevention  There is no cure for HIV/AIDS. But if you become infected, some drugs can help keep the HIV virus in check and slow the spread of HIV in the body. Doctors are now using a combination of drugs called HAART (highly active antiretroviral therapy) to treat HIV/AIDS. Although it is not a cure, HAART is greatly reducing the number of deaths from AIDS in this country.   You can action to prevent getting HIV/AIDS. Practice the steps below to lower your risk:
  • If you are having sex, make sure your partner has been tested and is free of HIV.
  • Ask him or her!   Use male or female condoms (latex or polyurethane) during sexual intercourse.
  • Do not share needles or any other equipment used to inject drugs.
  • Get tested if you or your partner had a blood transfusion between 1978 and 1985.
  • Get tested if you or your partner has had an operation or blood transfusion in a developing country at any time.

For More Information from Helpful Resources

AIDS.gov
www.aids.gov
AIDSinfo
P.O. Box 6303
Rockville, MD 20849-6303
800-448-0440 (toll-free)
Monday to Friday, 12:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time
888-480-3739 (TTY/TDD/toll-free))
www.aidsinfo.nih.gov
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
1600 Clifton Road
Atlanta, GA 30333
800-232-4636 (toll-free/24 hours a day,
7 days a week/English and Spanish)
888-232-6348 (TTY/toll-free)
www.cdc.gov
CDC National Prevention Information Network
P.O. Box 6003
Rockville, Maryland 20849-6003
800-458-5231 (toll-free)
800-243-7012 (TTY/toll-free)
www.cdcnpin.org
National Association on HIV Over Fifty
23 Miner Street
Boston, MA 02215-3319
617-233-7107
www.hivoverfifty.org
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
6610 Rockledge Drive, MSC 6612
Bethesda, MD 20892-6612
301-496-5717
866-284-4107 (toll-free)
800-877-8339 (TDD/toll-free)
www.niaid.nih.gov
Services & Advocacy for Gay, Lesbian,
Bisexual & Transgender Elders
305 7th Avenue
6th Floor
New York, NY 10001
212-741-2247
www.sageusa.org
For more information on health and aging, contact:
National Institute on Aging
Information Center
P.O. Box 8057
Gaithersburg, MD 20898-8057
800-222-2225 (toll-free)
800-222-4225 (TTY/toll-free)
www.nia.nih.gov, www.nia.nih.gov/espanol
To sign up for regular email alerts about new publications and other information from the NIA, go to www.nia.nih.gov/health.
Visit NIHSeniorHealth (www.nihseniorhealth.gov), a senior-friendly website from the National Institute on Aging and the National Library of Medicine. This website has health information for older adults. Special features make it simple to use. For example, you can click on a button to have the text read out loud or to make the type larger.
National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services March 2009   Page Last Updated: April 24, 2012





Friday, November 9, 2012

Our Brother's Keeper?


Many people who live near the shorelines of New York City and New Jersey have expressed their heartfelt gratitude to the many government workers and ordinary volunteers who pitched in to help those in need following the Hurricane Sandy storm.  Despite this help, many people perished and even more injured. It will take a long time to repair the damage and soften the sorrow.

Many people are discussing just what is our responsibility to care for others.  Is it the Government's problem? Is it citizens' task?  Or, must each of us figure out strategies to care for ourselves and our loved ones? 

What do you think?  Have you faced situations that made your rely on the "kindness of strangers?"  Or, have you been self-sufficient most of your life?  What do you think now. . . especially if  you have arrived at old age?

Please share some of your thinking--along with personal examples--to illustrate your stories.  Global Action on Aging welcomes your contribution to this discussion.  Simply fill in your ideas on our Comments Section.

In the meantime, have a great and trouble-free weekend!

Susanne Paul for Global Action on Aging

Wednesday, November 7, 2012

UK drafting new policies on end-of-life care and single-sex wards


The United Kingdom is revising the NHS (National Health Service) constitution to give more choice to patients and ensure that their wishes come first.  Here are some of the new policies under consideration:
Rules on involving patients and families in treatment decisions are being strengthened following an outcry over the secretive use of the Liverpool Care Pathway which involves withdrawal of fluids and food.  Under the measures being put forward for consultation, health trusts that fail to discuss issues properly could be sued. Doctors who ignore the wishes of patients and relatives face being struck off.

For the first time, a policy on single sex wards would be included in the constitution. It would pledge that those admitted to a hospital "will not have to share sleeping accommodation with patients of the opposite sex."  And, as the UN moves toward defining the Human Rights of Older Persons, it's important for aging advocates to learn what improvements the British Government is considering, such as: 
• A new right for patients to receive acknowledgement, an explanation and apology where mistakes have been made;
• A commitment that complaints will be acknowledged within three working days, and tougher rules on handling them;
A warning that abusive and violent patients could be denied access to National Health Service programs, if it is "safe" to do so;
The current Health Minister is committed to maintain the NHS.  Health minister Norman Lamb said the government was determined to protect the founding principles of the health service. "The NHS is "one of this country's greatest achievements. This government will always make sure it is free to all, no matter your age or the size of your bank balance," he said.   "That's why at the same time as we are protecting its budget, we are strengthening this constitution, which enshrines the right of everyone to have first class care, now and in the future."

Dear Reader, Is health care free in your country?   If so, is it quality care?  In my country, the US, health care can be very costly for persons of all ages and sometimes falls short of good care.  US Medicare helps but often does not underwrite the entire cost of care.  What is happening in your country?  Do you believe that you have a human right to health care?  Give us your comments.
Best wishes, Susanne Paul at Global Action on Aging




Saturday, November 3, 2012

Enduring the Hurricane Sandy Storm for Homebound Patients

Enduring the Storm for Homebound Patients


New York Times reporter John Leland captures the drama of older people caught in the aftermath of Sandy, the hurricane that hit New York City last Monday and Tuesday.
Nine flights above East 22nd Street, Russell Oberlin, 84, had no heat or electricity, no phone, no elevator service and two cancerous tumors on his right leg that required daily medical attention.


Hiroko Masuike/The New York Times
Suzanne Gilleran, 47, a nurse, visited Russell Oberlin, 84, who was without power in his apartment on East 22nd Street.                                  
As parts of the city edged toward some semblance of normal on Thursday, tens of thousands of people like Mr. Oberlin, who depend on essential home medical care, remained tenuously connected to lifesaving services by agencies like Partners in Care, an affiliate of the Visiting Nurse Service of New York.
At the Visiting Nurse Service of New York alone, more than 5,000 nurses, aides, social workers and others were out serving patients around the city during and after the storm.
Nurses and home aides, who often earn minimum wage or just above it, had to make a decision: go out in the storm or its aftermath, possibly risking their lives and ignoring conditions in their own homes, or make life possible for the patients depending on them.
“I saw six patients yesterday,” said Ms. Gilleran, who trains nurses at Partners in Care, and does not ordinarily make home visits. But because of Hurricane Sandy, the agency pressed all available registered nurses into field duty, as did other agencies around the city, often sending them into conditions made difficult by the weather: the power failures, the lack of public transit, the traffic.
It took Ms. Gilleran three hours on the express bus from Forest Hills, Queens, to get to Mr. Oberlin. Then there were the stairs. The lowest patient “was on the fourth floor,” she said, “the highest was on the 14th.”
“I realized,” she added, “I walked halfway up the Empire State Building, and most of the stairwells were pitch black.”
Allison Chisholm, 46, who works for the Visiting Nurse Service, lives with a frail mother in Park Slope, Brooklyn. When the lights started flickering during the storm on Monday, she had images of her mother falling in the dark. But she also had patients who needed her, including one receiving hospice care in a 12th floor apartment in Chinatown, and one needing an intravenous round of antibiotics in the West Village.
“It was treacherous driving during the hurricane,” said Ms. Chisholm, fitting an intravenous line into the arm of Jill Gerson, 71, who teaches social work at Lehman College in the Bronx. “But it’s just something you have to do as a nurse. That continuity of care helps the healing. I don’t see this as being heroic. I have a conscience. I need to get to sleep at night.”
Dr. Gerson had been hospitalized twice — first as a result of complications from a dental implant, then because of a reaction to her antibiotics. If she missed one day of antibiotics now, she would probably be all right, but two or three days could be life-threatening.
Dr. Gerson, who lives in the West Village, close to the Hudson River, stayed in her home rather than move in with friends, even as the water flowed down her street and into her basement.
“This woman has been saving my life,” she said, pointing to Ms. Chisholm.
Ghislaine Chery, 50, provides home care to patients at two housing projects in the Rockaways; under normal circumstances she travels with a guard. When the storm approached, and the Rockaways were subject to mandatory evacuation, she talked with her clients about leaving.
“After Irene, many of them had had to wait several days for buses to return, and they didn’t want to go through that again,” Ms. Chery said in a telephone interview. So they stayed — blind and in wheelchairs, blind and diabetic — counting on Ms. Chery, who lives on Long Island, to reach them with their medications and other essential services.
“I was here by 7:45 Tuesday morning,” Ms. Chery said. “I’ve been seeing 8 or 10 patients every day. It’s been a real experience.”
As the recovery drags on, a growing need is for mental health care. Scott Feldman, a social worker for the Visting Nurses, answered a call on Wednesday night for volunteers on Staten Island, where he lives. When he arrived at Tottenville High School, which was serving as a temporary shelter and evacuation center, he was directed to a couple in severe distress.
“They’d seen cars coming up their street, not being driven by anyone, just by the flood,” Mr. Feldman said. “They’d lost everything.” Then they tried to help another couple across the street, but had only been able to save the woman, Mr. Feldman said. “The wife was sleeping when I got there. The husband was waking up every hour screaming. So now what do they do?”
At Mr. Oberlin’s apartment, as Ms. Gilleran prepared to leave, taking the trash with her, Mr. Oberlin, who was a well-known countertenor and founding member of the New York Pro Musica Antiqua ensemble, beamed. “I can’t get over this service,” he said. “At the same time, I can see how expensive it must be.”
Dr. Gerson had a different opinion: “This service saves a fortune, because we don’t have to be in hospitals. They don’t pay these people enough.”
Ms. Chisholm waited patiently for the antibiotic drip to finish. She had a long way to go from the West Village back to Park Slope.

Monday, October 15, 2012

Chinese Premier wants more Social Pensions for Ctizens

The Chinese newspaper, Global Times, reports on October 15, 2012, that Premier Wen Jiabao has urged the government to step up its funding of social pensions for Chinese citizens. But what is a "social pension?"

It's any government-sponsored program with the following four characteristics: (1) laws or statutes that define the benefits, eligibility requirements and other features; (2) explicit provision is made to account for the income and expenses (often through a trust fund) of the program; (3) participants pay taxes or premiums to fund the program; it serves a defined population, and participation is either compulsory or the program is heavily enough subsidized that most eligible persons decide to participate.  In the US, social pensions include Social Security, Medicare, the Railroad Retirement program,and state-sponsored unemployent insurance programs, and others.

Do you have a social insurance program in your country?  If not, start campaigning today to get one.  Many NGOs that work alongside older people are demanding social pensions to insure that everyone in the country has a pension and other support when they need it.  Also, social pensions will be a key feature in any Human Rights Convention (treaty) that the UN drafts in the weeks and years ahead. 

Tell us your situation. Do you have a social pension now? Will you have one in the future?
Have a good week, Susanne Paul for Global Action on Aging

No Place for Elders in Kuala Lampur

Adult children and other family members are increasingly abandoning their 60-years-plus elders who have been hospitalized, according to reporters Lim Wey Wen and Yuen Meikeng writing in The Star, on October 8, 2012.  Earlier in 2011, some 200 seniors in this Malaysian city were left behind.  Nearly all came from poor families.  Six months into 2012, over 250 older people had been left in the hospital following their discharge.  NGOs that run public shelters had already filled their beds earlier in the year.

Why is this happening?  Poverty in families and in public funding for older people underlies this terrible situation.  In the most recent data collected in 2004, about 675,000 older parents received no funding from their children. 

What is your situation?  Would your adult children or other family members help you financially if your resources were exhausted?  Please comment.

Thanks, Susanne Paul for Global Action on Aging

Saturday, October 6, 2012

UN Member States may Start Work on a Convention to Guarantee the Human Rights of Older People


October 6, 2012

Dear GAA Friend,

EXCITING NEWS:   A UN Member State may well suggest next week (October 9-12, 2012) that the UN General Assembly consider a resolution to begin work leading to a Human Rights Convention on Aging. 

Nearly 100 Member States will have to vote in favor of the resolution for it to pass.  If successful, Member States would then begin to consider what human rights should be included in a Convention.

The prospect that the UN may move in this direction soon is very welcome news to older people everywhere, as well as NGOs, including Global Action on Aging.  We'll keep you posted on this exciting development in the days and weeks ahead. 

Have a great week, Susanne Paul for Global Action on Aging

Thursday, October 4, 2012

New American Media on Social Security Crisis

New American Media Post:  Larry Polivka, Posted Oct. 2, 2012

Federal Report Calls for Cuts, Ignores Americans’ Retirement-Security Crisis

Federal Report Calls for Cuts, Ignores Americans’ Retirement-Security Crisis
 


TALLAHASSEE, Fla.--A disturbing new report mandated by Congress from National Research Council (NRC) concludes that the rapid growth of the 65-plus population in the United States and the continuing strain on public resources will make Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid “unsustainable” over the next three decades.

What’s troubling, though, are not the report’s conclusions, but its bias toward a strictly budgetary outlook. Unfortunately, this study—from a federally chartered body charged with scientifically objective research--is so unbalanced that it does a disservice to the full range of viewpoints on this politically volatile issue.

The report, titled Aging and the Macroeconomy, fails to take into account the microeconomic realities facing tens of millions of Americans, especially lower-income and ethnic minority groups.

The report’s 14 authors are almost all economists, and the research group does not represent the range of social gerontologists or public health experts, who might have contributed a broader understanding of the human impact of programs the report suggests cutting.

As Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman stated in his New York Times column, Oct. 1, “Contrary to Beltway conventional wisdom, America does not have an ‘entitlements problem.’ Mainly, it has a health-cost problem, private as well as public,” that is not only in Medicare and Medicaid.

Recommendations Would Disadvantage Those in Need

The NRC report recommends that the government address the difficult years ahead by combining major changes to contain spending on Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, with efforts to urge people to work longer and save more during their working years. But these recommendations are likely to disadvantage the individuals and families who would be most affected by the emerging threats to a secure retirement.

Today's workers -- many of them trapped in low-wage, often physically grinding jobs with declining benefits -- are already facing a grim future in which the kind of retirement their parents were able to take for granted is out of reach.

Unemployment and stagnant or declining wages have drained American families of the capacity to save for retirement. And the recession has deeply undermined household wealth, especially for African Americans, Hispanics and other ethnic families.

The NRC report acknowledges that only half of American workers have private pensions and that most of them have seen substantial traditional pensions replaced by riskier and more-limited 401(k)s — the ones that depend on the fluctuating stock and bond markets.

Yet the NRC report’s recommendations that people worker longer and save more are disconnected from the realities of average workers. Median wages have remained stagnant or actually declined since the 1970s. Men with a high school degree or less have suffered as much as a 30 percent decline in income since 1973. Also, those with lower educational levels are losing ground to Americans at higher education levels in their life expectancy.

Increasingly, families have had to rely on debt to cover such essentials as housing and health care, which cost much more than they did in the 1980s. They don’t need the NRC economists to scold them.

In recommending that people work longer, the report’s contributors imply support for increasing the eligibility age for full Social Security benefits. This recommendation, however, ignores that many workers, especially those doing manual labor or other stressful jobs simply cannot work longer even if jobs were available.

Program Cuts Would Increase Elders’ Poverty

The report, instead of confronting our need to reverse the 30 years of economic policies that have undermined modern American retirement security, focuses on so-called structural changes, formulas that would partly cut the very programs Americans rely on for security in old age or at times when they can’t work. Those programs remain the only reliable sources of economic stability for many current seniors and most future retirees.

The budget reductions the report’s authors recommend would surely increase the number of older people in poverty. According to 2011 figures from the Census Bureau, senior impoverishment is already at 15.9 percent, if one includes out-of-pocket medical expenses—a cost not factored into the Federal Poverty Line.

Were the government to adopt the NRC report’s recommendations, expect access to appropriate health care to decline. Direct costs for beneficiaries--already 16 percent of income for those over 65, according to a 2011 Kaiser Family Foundation report—would rise with cuts to Medicare and Medicaid.

Even under current law, out-of-pocket costs are projected to reach 26 percent of the average beneficiary’s income by 2020, as increasing Medicare premiums and deductibles are subtracted from Social Security checks.

Rising Medicare costs are not a result of inefficiencies unique to the Medicare or Medicaid programs. What causes these increases are the same factors that have driven costs in the entire U.S. health care system significantly above the Consumer Price Index for almost 40 years.

These factors include advances in medical technology, such as genetically targeted drugs, and a health care system that is unique among developed nations by being so driven by shareholder value, high executive compensation and professional salaries, especially for doctors and administrators. Add to that out-of-pocket charges for what Medicare doesn’t cover.

Another new study reveals the enormous costs to patients in the last five years of their lives. Published by researchers at Mount Sinai School of Medicine, this research [http://bit.ly/SGOK4t] found that those costs average $38,688. And if Alzheimer’s disease is a factor, personal costs almost double to $66,105 with much of that amount coming from long-term care expenses not now covered by the Medicare program.

These are major reasons the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College estimates that over half of boomers will not achieve economic security in retirement.

Three-Quarters of Seniors at Risk

The level of economic risk facing retirees has risen steadily since the early 1980s. According to an analysis conducted by the Institute on Assets and Social Policy, 78 percent of all senior households are financially vulnerable and do not have enough economic security to sustain them for the rest of their lives.

Among senior households with a single person (mainly women), 84 percent are financially vulnerable, and 36 percent are at serious financial risk. Most of this economic jeopardy is generated by the lack of assets (low financial net worth) largely caused by the their inability to save while working, by small or no private pensions, by high and rising out-of-pocket medical costs, and by insufficient monthly income to absorb unexpected expenses.

The Great Recession has increased Americans’ level of financial risk by reducing retirement investment accounts and the value of equity in homes. Even though seniors have higher home ownership rates than younger people, they incur high housing costs because of rising property taxes in many areas, home repairs (try fixing a leaky roof on just Social Security income) and related factors.

Also, the report’s implied notion of raising the full Social Security retirement age ignores the fact that older minorities and aging white at lower income levels have significantly shorter lives than middle-class and elite-class whites. They would be substantially disadvantaged by a higher retirement age. These are also the groups, who will soon constitute a majority of older Americans.

A Better Strategy

A far better strategy for strengthening our shaky retirement security system would be to increase Social Security benefits for low income beneficiaries under or close to the poverty line, add long-term care as a Medicare benefit, and contain our out of control health care economy.

Neither this report nor any other that fails to address all of these issues honestly and fairly should be used as a guiding framework for dealing with our multi-faceted retirement security crisis. The NRC promises a follow-up study that will provide more “specific policy choices.” I hope that one will be more balanced.

Larry Polivka is Executive Director of the Claude Pepper Center at Florida State University and Scholar in Residence of the Claude Pepper Foundation. He is the former Director of the Florida Agency for Aging and Disabled Services.

Monday, October 1, 2012

UN urges Protection for Elderly as World Grays

Today, October 1, 2012, the UN launched its new report, "Ageing in the Twenty-First Century:  A Celebration and A Challenge," in both Japan and New York.  UNFPA and HelpAge International took primary responsibility for preparing the document with the collaboration of UNDESA, FAO, ILO, OHCHR, UNAIDS, UNDP, UN Habitat, UNCHR, UNICEF, UN Women, WFP, WHO, ECA, ECE, ECLAC, ESCAP, ESCWA, HelpAge USA, IFA, INPEA, IOM and Global Action on Aging. 

The reader will find amply reasons supporting an International Treaty to guarantee the human rights of older persons.  And you'll learn how older peoples' lives can be enhanced everywhere. We'll send you the link for the full text very soon.   Read on!   Susanne Paul for Global Action on Aging. 


October 1, 2012

UN urges protection for elderly as world grays


TOKYO — The fast aging of Japanese society is evident as soon as one lands at Tokyo's Narita airport and sees who is doing the cleaning. Young people tend to take such menial jobs in other countries, but here they are often held by workers obviously in the second half-century of their lives.

Having the world's highest percentage of older people is creating unique challenges for Japan, but a report released Monday by the U.N. Population Fund warns that they will not be unique for long. Japan is the only country with 30 percent of its population over 60, but by 2050 more than 60 other countries, from China to Canada to Albania, will be in the same boat.

The report urges governments to summon the political will to protect the elderly and ensure they can age with good health and dignity. Discrimination toward and poverty among the aged are still far too prevalent in many countries, it says, even in the relatively wealthy industrialized nations.

The problem is worse for women, whose access to jobs and health care is often limited throughout their lives, along with their rights to own and inherit property.

"More must be done to expose, investigate and prevent discrimination, abuse and violence against older persons, especially women who are more vulnerable," the report says, calling on countries to "ensure that aging is a time of opportunity for all."

"We need bold political leadership," said Babatunde Osotimehin, executive director of the Population Fund. "Aging is manageable, but first it must be managed."

In some countries, such as Latvia and Cyprus, about half of those over 60 are living in poverty. And even in highly industrialized countries such as Japan the elderly struggle to get some services.

Hisako Tsukida, a 77-year-old retired elementary school teacher in Japan's ancient capital of Kyoto, is living what sounds like a dream retirement life, taking tai chi and flower arrangement lessons and visiting a fitness center for spa treatments and muscle training.

But her current leisure followed many years of caring for her ailing husband and then for her mother. Japan's elderly often take on enormous burdens in caring for older relatives at home.

Tsukida spent years trying to find a nursing home for her mother, now 100, and finally succeeded about six months ago after a rare vacancy opened up. But now she wonders about the time when she'll have to go through the same struggle for herself.

"I wonder if I could do this again when I'm even older and need to find myself a place to go," she said.

The U.N. report said that policy discussions of all kinds must include a consideration of problems facing the aging if mankind is to reap a "longevity benefit" from people's longer life expectancies.

Governments should build safety nets to ensure older people have income security and access to essential health and social services, it said. The report cited data from the International Labor Organization showing that only about a fifth of all workers get comprehensive social insurance.

Aging is no longer solely an issue for rich countries. About two-thirds of people over 60 years old live in developing countries such as China, and by 2050 that figure is expected to rise to about 80 percent.

One in nine people — 810 million — are 60 or older, a figure projected to rise to one in five — or more than 2 billion — by 2050.

Even Japan, the world's third-largest economy, offers only meager social benefits, though government-subsidized services provide affordable household help and daycare in some areas.

Neighbors and religious groups often help older people, and public facilities have been vastly improved from a few decades ago, with elevators and other handicapped access now the norm.

The discovery earlier this year, though, that an aged couple and their son apparently had starved to death in their home in a Tokyo suburb highlighted Japan's own growing problems with poverty and unemployment.

Growing numbers of people suffering from dementia pose another challenge. About 35.6 million people around the world were afflicted with the disease in 2010, a number growing about 7.7 million a year and costing about $604 billion worldwide.

Provisions must be made for the infirm to ensure their basic human rights, the U.N. report says.

In many countries, including the United States, India, Brazil and Mexico, statistics show the elderly often pay more into pension systems over their lifetimes than they receive in return. Meanwhile, as retirement ages are raised and benefits cut due to ballooning deficits, the elderly are paying proportionately more in taxes.

The report blamed a bias toward youth in mass media, which stereotype aging as a time of decline, for lowering expectations about life for older people. It noted that older people often live highly productive, enjoyable lives if they have good health and reasonable levels of income.

The report's authors also argued against a prevalent belief that older workers should make way for younger job seekers, saying that way of thinking is based on the mistaken idea that there is a finite number of jobs and that workers are perfectly interchangeable.

"More jobs for older people do not mean fewer jobs for younger people," it says.

Friday, September 28, 2012

Medicare Bills Jump as Billing goes Electronic

New York Times article on "Medicare Bills Rise as Records Turn Electronic," September 22, 2012

The NY Times describes how US health costs rose steeply when the federal govermnent began incentives to encourage doctors and hospitals to use electronic record-keeping of patients. Why? It appears that the electronic billing forms allowed easy access for "add-on" claims for phantom services. The result?    Medicare costs shot upward and hospitals and doctors collected $1 billion more from Medicare in 2010 than they had received five years earlier.

On September 25, Medicare announced that it will investigate this development and design ways to reduce what appears to be wholesale bilking of sick people, including many of whom are older. But can Medicare devise and enforce effective ways to insure that doctors and hospitals are billing for their actual costs? As consumers, you and I must check our bills for medical services to learn whether the medical professionals actually performed the tasks they claim. If they did not, notify Medicare.

Older persons often need and have a right to quality medical attention. But we must protect Medicare from phantom services. Have you discovered over-billing on your medical bills? If so, share your experience with Global Action on Aging and our readers.

Have a great day, Susanne Paul for Global Action on Aging

Friday, September 21, 2012

Breakthrough News for Older Persons!

Dear GAA Friend,

The countries of Latin American and the Caribbean nations may well be the champions of older persons' rights at the United Nations this fall. It is possible that diplomats may begin work during this UN Session on a binding human rights instrument on aging if proponents can secure sufficient votes among their colleagues.

What can you do to help?  Contact the National Aging Authority in your country to urge him or her to join the delegations supporting this initiative at the United Nations.  GAA will keep you informed with breaking news in the days and weeks ahead.

Today older people everywhere can have tangible hope for a human rights treaty on older people's rights across the globe.  Please write to tell Global Action on Aging readers about your intervention!

Thanks, Susanne Paul for Global Action on Aging

Tuesday, November 16, 2010

A day with Chiquita Smith


An Activist for Nursing Home Seniors

GAA interns Nuri Han and Scott Kelly had the pleasure of speaking with a GAA supporter, Chiquita Smith. This Brooklyn activist defends the rights of nursing home residents. Every month Chiquita makes personal visits to several of the 26 nursing homes in her borough. After talking with any residents she knows and getting a sense of the place, she calls the Board of Health or the nursing home director to make sure her concerns about residents’ care are heard. This inspiring work is made even more impressive by the fact that Chiquita is 87 and blind.

“It’s personal”

Over the years Chiquita became interested in elder rights through visits to her family members and friends in nursing homes. “It is personal,” she says about her decision to check up on possible abuses by these institutions that housed her friends and family. Of a more general concern is what she calls the “shifting of seniors”—the trend to move seniors from their apartment or house to an institution, such as a nursing home. She wonders whether older persons living in nursing homes feel comfortable in such unfamiliar surroundings and whether they face abuse or neglect in the institutions.

Chiquita makes it a point to visit a nursing home if one of her friends or relatives has recently moved there. She’s even visited nursing homes as distant as Washington, DC, or Philadelphia.

“Are these people being treated like human beings?”

Whenever Chiquita visits a nursing home, one major question guides her; “Are these people treated like human beings?” To assure that they are, she first engages the residents, asking whether they are properly dressed, not wearing mismatched or dirty clothes. She touches the residents’ hands and talks with them. They always smile at her. They all have stories to tell and they enjoy speaking with other people. She also asks if weekly schedules for the dining hall and for recreational activities are posted. Some nursing homes might only let their residents go outside on rare occasions, left instead sitting and idle inside—a lonely, monotonous existence. Some nursing homes even allow outside businesses, such as a “dollar store,” to come in to offer a selection of items for the residents to buy.

Chiquita checks possible institutional abuses by the nursing home. She said that some nursing home residents with larger pensions are taken advantage of by family and nursing home administrators. Recently, she has focused on how the nursing home may ignore residents’ right to vote in elections. She asks whether they had easy access to a ballot; almost none did. Chiquita believes no one is too old to vote. She contends that the nursing home must facilitate the voting process for its residents. She also tries to talk with the nurses and, if possible, the administrators to make sure they know someone is watching. If the situation is bad, she will call the Board of Health, or make another surprise visit to check up. At her local church she shares her observations with her senior group called “The Golden Circle.” It’s essential for her to share her findings with as many people, through as many channels, as possible.

“Day of Visitation”

Chiquita wants everyone to know that even a little gesture, like a card or phone call, makes a difference for the residents, who may rarely hear from family or friends. She proposes a “Day of Visitation” for those who are interested in these issues. Simply go visit the residents, talk with them, and touch their hands—you’ll be surprised by how appreciative the residents will be! She advises visitors to send cards to the residents after you visit!

On the institutional level, she hopes every nursing home will create a specific “Friends and Family Day” to encourage monthly visits. She suggests people contact their elected officials so he or she will understand the process and politics better. Too often these officials are unaware of the situation at nursing homes.

“Go and visit!”

If you’re interested in learning more about nursing homes, Chiquita suggests calling the Board of Health to get the official list of nursing homes. Then, go visit! Ask for literature on the place and about its policies. Ask questions about how it works, talk with the residents. What are they doing? Where are they? How do they look? It’s not so much a matter of asking the right questions; it’s about letting the administration know that someone is watching so they become more aware and alert to these issues. And, of course, it’s about providing companionship to those who are often neglected. Lastly, Chiquita suggests publicizing what people observe or learn, through Global Action on Aging, your religious institution or any other means you may have.

Inform yourself, engage yourself! Be active like Chiquita! She has been at it for years now and has no plan to stop!