Reports from New America Media say that President Obama will likely put Social Security's annual cost of living adjustments (COLA) on the chopping block--even though doing so would not reduce the federal debt by a penny.
Read this excerpted analysis from Nancy J. Altman, author of The Battle for Social Security, and Eric Kingson, a professor at Syracuse University, co-directors of Social Security Works, Washington D.C.
. . . "Social Security is barred by law from borrowing
funds to cover its costs; it cannot add to the deficit and should not be part of
deficit discussions at all. Why politicians – especially the president -- keep
bringing it up is a question our policymakers have never answered
" . . . The idea is to reduce the future cost of Social Security by
using a stingier CPI formula. But the very purpose of adding the COLA to checks
year-to-year is to keep Social Security benefits up with inflation, and maintain
a decent standard of living for retirees, those with disabilities and, when a
family breadwinner dies, his or her surviving spouse and children.
the chained-CPI would cut already modest Social Security benefits – $13,600 on
average -- more each year. This cut would hit Social Security beneficiaries
hardest in their 80s or older, or after years of disability when they are most
likely to have exhausted their savings.
Social Security’s moderate
benefits, especially compared with other counties, are vital to people with
fixed or limited incomes. The current CPI index the government uses fails to
measures the inflation seniors and those with disabilities experience because it
does not adequately account for health care.
Most Americans assume that
Medicare covers health costs, but as important as that program is, people 65 or
older spend, on average, more than twice as much on
health care as those ages 25-64, about 13 percent compared to 5 percent.
Also, the current CPI calculation understates the cost of housing. You may own
your home, but, for instance, be one roof-repair away from poverty.
switching to the chained CPI would provide an even less accurate and less
sustainable measure for people trying to make ends meet. And its impact would
compound over time.
The chained-CPI would pull $112 billion directly out
of the pockets of beneficiaries over the next 10 years and much more thereafter.
A typical Social Security retiree would lose the equivalent of roughly $500 a
year (in today’s dollars) at age 75 under the chained CPI, compared to the
current formula; $1,000 in their 85th year and $1,500 at age 95.
may not sound like a lot of money, but two-thirds of seniors depend on Social
Security for half or more of their income. And one in three seniors rely on the
program for at least 90 percent of their income. The chained-CPI cut
would translate into the cost of two weeks of food per month for a 95 year-old
Ethnic Elders and Older Women
In fact, the growing
impact would be large in almost anyone’s book. Typically, over the years, the
would amount to $4,600 by age 75, $13,900 by 85, and $28,000 for those
fortunate enough to live to 95. How’s that for a Happy Birthday
Ethnic elders stand to lose the most because Social Security is
usually a greater share of their retirement income. Even before the Great
Recession, in 2007, the average
household of color had just 16 percent of the wealth possessed by the
average white household.
The impact of the chained-CPI would be
especially harsh on older ethnic women because they are far more likely than
other groups to work in low-wage professions. Also, they are less likely to have
other sources of retirement income. Astoundingly, more than four out of
10 single African American women or Latinas
live below the poverty line today. And the proportion rises as these groups
Because African American women have the lowest rates of
marriage in the United States, they are far more vulnerable to poverty in old
age. One out of six single women above the age of 65 live in poverty—triple the
poverty rate of married women 65-plus.
Indeed, the chained CPI would
drive a disproportionate number of ethnic seniors into poverty. Of the nearly
250,000 Social Security beneficiaries who would fall into poverty due to the chained CPI in
2050, over 160,000 are projected to be black or Latino.
In his State of
the Union address, President Obama spoke of the importance of a “secure
retirement.” To help make that aspiration a reality, policymakers should be
talking about increasing, not decreasing Social Security. A good place to start
is with a more, not less, accurate measure of inflation adjustments, so those
modest pension amounts do not decline as more and more Americans reach very old
Blog Readers: Write your Congressional Representatives; Demonstrate against these Cuts; Call your friends and join them in taking action! The People--united--can stop this planned robbery of Older Persons. And send your comments to GAA. Thanks!
Susanne Paul for Global Action on Aging